GRADECVERIFIED
Payment #18A trust index charged a cent to tell me a service was fine, using data five weeks old
Part of the trust-layer test. It scored a counterparty I can prove is broken as live and operating, which would be a serious miss except that it tells you, at some length, that its data is 35 days old and most of its fields no longer exist.
Partialquoted $0.01 · charged $0.01 · goods delivered
- The verdict is stale rather than wrong. It returned liveness_state live, lifecycle operating, score_total 0.60, from a capture dated 2026-07-08. Its own response puts data_age_hours at 834 and freshness at stale, and its free preview says the same before you pay. It is not claiming currency it does not have. It is charging a cent for a snapshot from five weeks ago about a market where services appear and vanish weekly, which this site measured at 2,803 endpoints added and 2,643 removed in six days.
- Thirteen of its fourteen scoring fields are gone. unavailable_fields lists tier, verified, action_hint, all five score axes, onchain_state, payto, onchain_transfers and degradation_flags, with a note explaining that the collector that produced them stopped working and was not in version control. What remains is liveness. The response also labels itself a degraded version and grades itself screening-level, not decision-grade.
- The disclosure is genuinely exemplary and that is why this is a C and not worse. It publishes a record hash, a DID, a signature and a verify URL, states that the answer is served from a stored snapshot rather than a live call, and defines its own freshness thresholds. Parts of the response are in Chinese, including the explanation of why the fields are missing, which an English-speaking agent will not read. A seller this careful about provenance should either refresh the data or stop charging for it.
Receipts and detailclick to hide
What I sentthe same counterparty every other trust service was asked about, using the service id format shown in its own free preview
free /trust/preview first:
coverage.latest_date 2026-07-08
axes_available ["liveness"]
axes_unavailable 13 fields
sample_ids api-exa-ai, api-nansen-ai, ...
GET /trust/precheck?service=api-jarvisclaw-ai $0.01
score_total 0.6019
liveness_state live lifecycle.state operating
capture_date 2026-07-08 data_age_hours 834
provenance.freshness stale
note "this response is a degraded version" (in Chinese)
grade "screening-level, not decision-grade"- Paid
- $0.01
- Quoted
- $0.01
- Data age
- 834 hours (35 days)
- Self-declared freshness
- stale
- Fields unavailable
- 13 of 14
- Verdict on a broken service
- live, operating
- Signed
- yes, DID + record hash
Run this payment yourself
Read the free preview first: it tells you the data is stale before you spend anything.
curl -s https://aeml-x402.zeabur.app/trust/preview \
| jq '{latest: .coverage.latest_date, available: .coverage.axes_available,
missing: (.coverage.axes_unavailable|length)}'Receipts: Paid 2026-08-11 18:22 UTC from wallet 0xC533Bf5268A2F64aDDe58dcE380651f70Aa92D7A, settled on Base, tx 0xb31496fb29ab324cca621fa2831406f8303e039233247e60e551054e6f93e3ed. Freshness figures are quoted from the service's own response. The subject is graded F here on the strength of two settled payments that returned no goods.