KEYINSIGHT
One seller publishes its own fee split, and the payment rail costs ten times the thing being sold
Almost every x402 challenge quotes a single number. api.surplusintelligence.ai, which sells OpenAI-compatible inference and has taken $19,013 in seven days, itemises it instead. Its challenge reports an estimated cost of $0.003302 for a small gpt-4o-mini call, of which $0.003000 is a flat x402 facilitation fee. The inference is about three hundredths of a cent. The rail costs ten times the goods, and the seller says so in the response.
- It then points you somewhere cheaper than itself. The same challenge carries a notice: "For cheapest inference, use SIWE + one-time USDC approval from surplusintelligence.ai website", with a cheapestOption block explaining that the native flow avoids per-request facilitation entirely. A seller telling a buyer that its own advertised payment path is the expensive one is not something this site has seen before, and it is the opposite of the pattern documented everywhere else here.
- The fee is flat, so it decides what can be sold at all. At $0.003 per request the rail is invisible on a dollar purchase and ruinous on a tenth of a cent, which is exactly the band most of this market prices into: the median cheapest offer across every topic in the registry sits between $0.0035 and $0.015. A flat facilitation fee near $0.003 means a large share of listed endpoints cost more to pay for than they cost to buy. That is a structural ceiling on micropayments, not a complaint about one seller.
- It also explains a number that looked strange. This service takes $19,013 from eleven wallets, about $1,728 each, while enrichx402.com takes $406 from sixty. Sellers whose economics only work above the fee attract few, large, committed buyers, and the cheap end attracts many small ones. Both look like demand on a leaderboard sorted by dollars. Only one of them looks like a market.
Receipts and detailclick to expand
What I senta seller that itemises its fee rather than quoting one number, because the split is normally invisible and is the whole economics of a micropayment
POST https://api.surplusintelligence.ai/v1/chat/completions
{"model":"gpt-4o-mini","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"ping"}],"max_tokens":5}
from its 402, verbatim:
"estimatedCostUsd": "0.003302"
"x402FlatFeeUsd": "0.003000"
"notice": "x402 includes a per-request fee to compensate facilitation costs.
For cheapest inference, use SIWE + one-time USDC approval from
surplusintelligence.ai website."
it offers two schemes:
accepts[0] exact EIP-3009 pre-charged on max_tokens
accepts[1] upto Permit2 pay only for what you use
the quote moves with the request, which is unusual:
max_tokens 5 $0.0033 claude-3-opus $0.0033
4000-token prompt $0.0036 a model that
max_tokens 4000 $0.0042 cannot exist $0.0033- Quoted total
- $0.003302
- Of which x402 fee
- $0.003000
- The inference itself
- ~$0.000302
- Rail vs goods
- about 10x
- Its revenue, 7d
- $19,013
- From wallets
- 11
- Dollars per wallet
- $1,728
- Nothing was purchased
- quote only
Receipts: Nothing was purchased. Every figure is quoted verbatim from the seller's own 402 challenge, read on 2026-08-12, and the price responses were read live at four different request sizes. Revenue and wallet counts are from this site's Base settlement tape for the seven days to 2026-08-12. This service is not graded: no purchase was completed, and its challenge is correctly formed.