locus.report
Parcel facts for an address. Perfect for: 'what is the lot size / acreage of this property', 'year built for an address', 'land use / zoning class of a parcel', 'look up parcel.
- Underdelivered on 1 paid call(s): a real response missing promised fields, confirmed on two calls.
- Almost all its revenue comes from a single wallet, so volume is not broad demand.
Grades
No purchase-based grade yet. Everything below was measured, by paying this seller or by sweeping the chain, and none of it is editorial.
Is the demand real?
Organic Demand Score measures the shape of the money and not its size or its honesty: how many distinct wallets paid, how evenly the dollars fell across them, and how many came back. Revenue is excluded on purpose, because a big number is not evidence anyone wanted the product. These are also the exact quantities a wash trader would optimise, so it is a starting point and not a verdict.
Did it deliver what it promised?
0 of 1 endpoint we paid returned everything their own published schema promised.
- short missing 3 of 4
/api/locus-parcel-lookup· 3,983ms · 37 bonus field(s)Real response shape
{ "resolved": "boolean", "address": "string", "coverage": "string", "sourceStatus": "string", "parsed": { "raw": "string", "houseNumber": "string", "streetName": "string", "likePrefix": "string", "city": "string", "state": "string", "zip": "string", "county": "string" }, "parcel": { "parcelId": "string", "siteAddress": "string", "jurisdiction": { "municipality": "string", "state": "string", "county": "string" }, "landUse": "string", "landClass": "string", "acreage": "number", "yearBuilt": "integer", "heatedAreaSqft": "integer", "citation": { "sourceName": "string", "sourceUrl": "string", "fetchedAt": "string", "recordId": "string" } }, "summary": "string", "jurisdiction": { "municipality": "string", "state": "string", "county": "string" }, "matchedSource": "string", "candidateCount": "integer", "centroid": { "latitude": "number", "longitude": "number" }, "centroidPrecision": "string", "citations": { "array_of": { "sourceName": "string", "sourceUrl": "string", "fetchedAt": "string", "recordId": "string" } }, "caveats": { "array_of": "string" }, "note": "string" }Types only, verified from a real paid call. Values discarded.
This is a paid delivery check: we called the endpoint with its own advertised input and compared the response against its own advertised output. It is the one thing free probing cannot see.
Verifiable receipts
1 paid call to this host are recorded as tamper-evident receipts, including 1 where it underdelivered. Each can be re-verified independently, from the archived bytes up.
wab_c547d28d34cac921locus.report
Promised 4 fields for $0.01, charged $0.01, and underdelivered: returned 1 of 4. Missing generatedAt, id, records. Shortfall confirmed on two calls.
Evidence and how to verify it yourself
The real response shape, types only, values discarded:
{
"address": "string",
"candidateCount": "integer",
"caveats": {
"array_of": "string"
},
"centroid": {
"latitude": "number",
"longitude": "number"
},
"centroidPrecision": "string",
"citations": {
"array_of": {
"fetchedAt": "string",
"recordId": "string",
"sourceName": "string",
"sourceUrl": "string"
}
},
"coverage": "string",
"jurisdiction": {
"county": "string",
"municipality": "string",
"state": "string"
},
"matchedSource": "string",
"note": "string",
"parcel": {
"acreage": "number",
"citation": {
"fetchedAt": "string",
"recordId": "string",
"sourceName": "string",
"sourceUrl": "string"
},
"heatedAreaSqft": "integer",
"jurisdiction": {
"county": "string",
"municipality": "string",
"state": "string"
},
"landClass": "string",
"landUse": "string",
"parcelId": "string",
"siteAddress": "string",
"yearBuilt": "integer"
},
"parsed": {
"city": "string",
"county": "string",
"houseNumber": "string",
"likePrefix": "string",
"raw": "string",
"state": "string",
"streetName": "string",
"zip": "string"
},
"resolved": "boolean",
"sourceStatus": "string",
"summary": "string"
}Three independent checks, none needing trust in this site: integrity recomputes the id as a hash of the evidence, so any edit shows; verdict re-derives the result offline; raw re-reads the untouched bytes archived at pay time and reproduces the shape.
python3 receipts.py --verify wab_c547d28d34cac921The full record and the format are at /receipts.
What it sells
2 endpoints listed, priced $0.0100 to $0.0100, settling on Base, Solana.
$0.0100Parcel facts for an address or jurisdiction-scoped parcel id. Perfect for: 'what is the lot size / acreage of this pro$0.0100EPA National Emissions Inventory facility and pollutant rows near an address. Perfect for: environmental diligence, fa
Growing or dying?
Daily USDC into this address across the tape, 2026-08-04 to 2026-09-29. It grew over that window. A missing day is a day the sweep did not run, not a day with no revenue.
Registry claim against the chain
The directory credits this service with 4 calls over 30 days. The chain shows 5 settled payments in the last 24 hours alone. Registry counters are not demand and can be bought, so they are shown here for contrast rather than as a measurement.
Grades here come from paying this service and recording what happened, or from calling it where it is free. Settlement figures are swept daily from Base USDC Transfer logs. Nothing on this page is sponsored.